![]() Papaian, Tumanjan, and Malkasian are also Board members. The FAC alleges in pertinent part as follows.Īt all times relevant, Grigorian was one of five members of Club’s Board of Directors (“Board”). The operative pleading is the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) names Club as Respondent and alleges causes of action for access to corporate records and accounting, declaratory relief, and removal of directors. (“Warren”), Papaian, Michael Tumanjan (“Tumanjan”), and Tom Malkasian (“Malkasian”). Plaintiff Grigorian commenced this proceeding on Novemagainst Defendants Nedy Warren, Esq. The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. ![]() (“Club”) and members of its board of directors, management, their family members, or entities in which any of them hold ownership interests. Plaintiff Lysa Grigorian (“Grigorian”) seeks a writ of mandate compelling access to corporate records withheld by Defendant Haig Papaian (“Papaian”) and ordering an independent court audit of all related party transactions between Respondent California Commerce Club, Inc. Tentative decision on petition for writ of mandate: granted in part
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |